header-logo header-logo

17 November 2009
Issue: 7393 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Pro bono week

Lawyers provided more than £400m worth of pro bono legal advice last year as recession swept the UK.

The estimated value of pro bono work undertaken by solicitors, based on the number of chargeable hours, has soared nearly 18% to £339m from £338m in 2007, according to the latest Law Society Firms Omnibus survey.

This figure does not include the significant contribution made by barristers, in-house solicitors and legal executives.

The eighth annual Pro Bono Week (9-13 November 2009) kicked off with the Joint National Pro Bono Conference, which was addressed by legal aid minister Lord Bach and Lord Goldsmith QC. More than 100 activities were due to take place throughout the week, ranging from staff roadshows to fund-raising quiz nights.

The College of Law launched three telephone advice lines during the week to offer free guidance on employment rights to people who might not otherwise be able to afford legal advice.

Lindsay Ward, senior pro bono co-ordinator at the College, says: “These schemes allow students to get experience in dealing with real cases and also help the local community.”

Desmond Browne QC, chair of the Bar Council, says: “The Bar Pro Bono Unit, the Free Representation Unit, and all those who give their time and expertise for free to those who need it most, are an incredibly important part of the Bar’s contribution to the community. 

“Cases such as that featuring Val Compton, a retired physiotherapist who fought, on behalf of her community, against the closure of large parts of her local hospital, are typical of the work carried out on a pro bono basis. Four lawyers worked pro bono on this case over the course of two years, spending more than 180 days on a cause which was of huge importance to the community.”

Robert Heslett, Law Society president, says: “It must be remembered that pro bono is not a replacement for a legal aid system adequately funded by government.”
 

Issue: 7393 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll