header-logo header-logo

08 November 2021
Issue: 7956 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Pro bono barristers celebrate awards as Advocate turns 25

Advocate, the Bar’s pro bono organisation formerly known as the Bar Pro Bono Unit, marked its quarter-century anniversary in style last week at its annual awards ceremony

There were 46 nominations across nine categories at the awards, sponsored by LexisNexis, including the new John Collins Pro Bono Excellence Award, won by pro bono enthusiast Sarah Blackmore, joint head of chambers at Spire Barristers.

Sarah Abram, Brick Court, won Junior Barrister for her work, including being the only barrister willing to travel to Luxembourg in the pandemic to represent an environmental NGO at a hearing, the outcome of which had a profound effect on environmental campaigners’ ability to challenge highly polluting infrastructure projects. 

The Queen’s Counsel award went to Anthony Metzer QC, Goldsmith Chambers, whose work includes forming a specialist team to advise on the international sanctions regimes to finance restorative justice for victims of sexual violence in conflict, with particular focus on the Yazidi victims of Da’esh.

Rhys Davies, Temple Garden, and Ben Keith, 5 St Andrew’s Hill, jointly won International Barrister for helping a British man wrongly imprisoned in Dubai for 13 years in a complex case spanning multiple jurisdictions. 12 King’s Bench Walk, which encouraged its members to dedicate nearly 700 hours to Advocate cases, won Chambers of the Year. Chambers Professional was given jointly to Leigh Royall, Spire Barristers and Patrick Sarson, Gatehouse Chambers.

Pro Bono Innovation was awarded to Leducate, which aims to promote an understanding of everyday legal rights among secondary school-aged students through an online learning platform.

Lord Goldsmith QC, founder of Advocate and Chair of the judging panel, said: ‘When I set up the Bar Pro Bono Unit (as Advocate was), I did not know what the take up by the Bar would be.  But I was bowled over by the willingness of the Bar to do pro bono work and I remain humbled by how willing the Bar is.’

Issue: 7956 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll