header-logo header-logo

22 July 2010
Issue: 7427 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Privilege right upheld

Quinn ruling protects privileged information

Solicitors are not obliged to disclose privileged information to insurers in the absence of a claim or waiver, the Court of Appeal has held in an important case on disclosure.

In Quinn Direct Insurance v Law Society [2010] EWCA Civ 805, the appeal judges upheld the High Court’s decision that insurers could not access documents seized from a two-partner law firm during an intervention by the Solicitors Regulation Authority unless the client waived privilege.

The insurer, Quinn, wished to view the documents to assess whether it was obliged to indemnify the second partner of the firm. The Law Society argued the files were subject to legal privilege and could not be disclosed.

Nick Bird, partner at Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP, says: “Quinn argued that they were entitled to see the files because insurers of solicitors were part of the regulatory framework of solicitors in England and Wales.

“They also said that they were within a ‘circle of trust’ which entitled them to see confidential material but not to pass it on. The Court of Appeal rejected these arguments, so insurers will have greater difficulty in obtaining material to try and avoid cover in this situation.

“However, the court also said that this may now prevent solicitors from complying with their duties under the policy of insurance to disclose confidential information as part of the renewal and notification process. This may cause conflicts between the solicitor’s obligations under his insurance policy and the duty he has to his client.

“If the judgment is not appealed and remains the law then either some solicitors will have to revise their terms and conditions so that the client waives privilege for the purpose of notifying insurers, or insurance policies will have to be amended to prevent solicitors from being under any duty to disclose this material.”
 

Issue: 7427 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll