header-logo header-logo

Private taxi operators take on Uber

17 July 2024
Issue: 8080 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Transport
printer mail-detail
Uber has lost its case against private hire vehicle operators over contract terms, in a decision with major financial implications for both local authorities and taxi companies

The Court of Appeal handed down judgment this week, in DELTA Merseyside and Veezu holdings v Uber Britannia [2024] EWCA Civ 802, overturning a High Court ruling last July that operators must enter as principal into a contract with passengers.

Intervening in the High Court case, private hire operators warned passengers would have to pay VAT on journeys, potentially raising fares by 20%.

Both DELTA and Veezu use an app to manage bookings, acting as intermediary between driver and passenger. Drivers pay DELTA a fee, called a ‘settle’, for putting them in touch with a customer. Veezu also provides services for school runs and medical transportation.

Lord Justice Lewison, giving the main judgment, said: ‘A booking may not necessarily specify any journey; or even be made for a journey at all.

‘A vehicle may be booked simply to be on stand-by. It is thus plain (and indeed is now common ground) that the declaration made by the judge is inappropriate. It assumes that the booking is made by "the passenger", which is not necessarily the case, and it assumes that the contract is one "to provide the journey" which is also not necessarily the case.’

Layla Barke-Jones, dispute resolution partner at Aaron & Partners, representing Delta Taxis, said the decision was ‘a victory for the taxi industry and all those who depend on it.

‘This frequently includes the disabled, elderly and low-income households. This was a landmark case, the result of which could have had a terrible impact on the lives of so many people—not to mention the administrative burden for operators.’

The case does not affect London, where different taxi regulations apply.

Issue: 8080 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Transport
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll