header-logo header-logo

27 July 2012 / Tom Morrison
Issue: 7524 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

Private eye

istock_000001153004medium_4

Tom Morrison returns with his quarterly review of the world of information law

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust has been handed the largest civil monetary penalty issued so far under the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998). At £325,000, this substantial fine was issued following the theft of computer hard drives containing confidential information relating to thousands of patients and staff in September 2010. Highly sensitive personal data was found on hard drives sold on eBay two months later. The data included details of patients’ medical conditions and treatment, disability living allowance forms and reports on children. It also included documents containing staff details such as National Insurance numbers, home addresses and information referring to criminal convictions and suspected offences.

Source of the information breach

It seems that the source of the breach was an individual engaged by the trust’s IT services provider which was supposed to securely destroy approximately 1,000 hard drives held in a secure room at Brighton General Hospital. Four of those hard drives made their way

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll