header-logo header-logo

Privacy matters

26 July 2018 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7803 / Categories: Opinion , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail
nlj_7803_aamodt

Sir Cliff’s victory will not end the tug of war between press freedom & the rights of individuals, says Athelstane Aamodt

The judgment of Mann J in the case of Sir Cliff Richard v The BBC & The Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) was set to be a hugely pivotal decision in the continual tug-of-war between press freedom and the rights of individuals, and so it proved to be. The judge’s ruling, that the BBC’s coverage of the search of Sir Cliff’s property in Berkshire by South Yorkshire Police in 2014 infringed his right to privacy, and that he is entitled to £210,000 in general damages (the special damage will be assessed later) will have a marked influence on what the press can and cannot say about the investigation of a suspect before arrest. But what will be the extent of that effect? And does this case, as some sections of the press have alleged, really take us down a dark road of unscrutinised police investigations and secrecy?

  • The first thing
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Tech companies will be legally required to prevent material that encourages or assists serious self-harm appearing on their platforms, under Online Safety Act 2023 regulations due to come into force in the autumn
Commercial leasehold, the defence of insanity and ‘consent’ in the criminal law are among the next tranche of projects for the Law Commission
The Bar has a culture of ‘impunity’ and ‘collusive bystanding’ in which making a complaint is deemed career-ending due to a ‘cohort of untouchables’ at the top, Baroness Harriet Harman KC has found

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has secured £1.1m in its first use of an Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO)

County court cases are speeding up, with the median time from claim to hearing 62 weeks for fast, intermediate and multi-track claims—5.4 weeks faster than last year
back-to-top-scroll