header-logo header-logo

Privacy

30 May 2014
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Privacy International) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2014] EWHC 1475 (Admin), [2014] All ER (D) 83 (May)

The issue in the case concerned the powers and duties of the defendant Revenue and Customs Commissioners to disclose information about its export control functions to the claimant non-governmental organisation, Privacy International. The court ruled (inter alia) that there was no discrete or freestanding function of the Revenue to provide information to third parties. However, it was not exempt from disclosure under s 18(2) of the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005 if and insofar as it met the test therein. Further, the Revenue’s margin of appreciation could not be uniformly categorised. In some circumstances it might be materially or even very substantially circumscribed, in other cases it might be relatively broad. The outcome might differ depending upon the status of the person seeking information and the type and nature of information sought. It might also be temporally contingent, in that a wide-ranging request for detailed information at the outset of an investigation might be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll