header-logo header-logo

Prison terms for kidnap & blackmail

12 February 2025
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Judges have, for the first time, been issued with sentencing guidelines on blackmail, kidnap and false imprisonment.

The first guideline, published this week by the Sentencing Council, covers blackmail under the Theft Act 1968, which generally involves demands for money or other property coupled with threats to the victim.

The guideline recognises the psychological harm and distress caused. It suggests a range of four to ten years in custody for the most serious offences in terms of culpability and harm, such as repeated or prolonged conduct, sophisticated planning, use of violence and deliberate targeting of particularly vulnerable victims. A high-level community order may be imposed for the least serious offences, for example, where the property demanded would ‘represent a limited loss’ to the victim.

Under the second guideline, on the common law offences of kidnap or false imprisonment, individuals may receive a high-level community order for the least serious levels of offence, and up to 16 years’ custody where there is high culpability and the highest level of harm.

The guideline allows the courts to recognise that false imprisonment in particular often occurs within the context of domestic abuse.

Sentencing Council member Mrs Justice May said the offences ‘are personal in nature, can leave victims feeling distressed and violated, and are often committed in cases involving domestic abuse.

‘The new guidelines from the Sentencing Council will enable the courts to take a consistent approach to sentencing these offences and help them pass sentences that recognise the full extent of the devastating impact these crimes can have on victims’ lives.’

The Sentencing Council consulted on the draft guidelines last January, receiving a ‘broadly positive’ response. For both draft guidelines, about half of those responding felt the proposed sentence levels were about right.

The guidelines, which apply to adults, come into effect on 1 April.

Issue: 8104 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll