header-logo header-logo

06 May 2010 / Alison Pickup
Issue: 7416 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Presume nothing

Alison Pickup analyses the changing nature of detaining foreign prisoners

In WL (Congo); KM (Jamaica) v SSHD [2010] EWCA Civ 111, [2010] All ER (D) 221 (Feb) the appellants were foreign national prisoners (FNPs), detained beyond the end of their sentence pending their deportation from the UK under powers contained in Sch 3 of the Immigration Act 1971 (the 1971 Act).

It had emerged in the course of litigation that during a period from approximately April 2006, when the so-called “foreign national prisoners crisis” broke, until September 2008, officials in the Home Office’s Criminal Casework Directorate (CCD), which dealt with the detention and deportation of FNPs, had been operating a blanket policy of detaining all FNPs, despite the fact that their published policy stated that there was a presumption in favour of release in all cases. In September 2008, the published policy was amended so that it now contained a presumption in favour of detention of FNPs, which was then applied by CCD. This policy operated until January 2009, when, following the judgment of the Administrative

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll