header-logo header-logo

Press versus privacy in injury claims

01 September 2025
Issue: 8129 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Health , Media , Privacy
printer mail-detail
The Court of Appeal has confirmed the judiciary’s discretion to grant anonymity orders to vulnerable claimants in personal injury claims, in a landmark judgment

PMC v A Local Health Board [2025] EWCA Civ 1126 concerned a teenager entirely reliant on the care of others whose health condition stemmed from injuries sustained during labour, and who had been the focus of media coverage previously. The case centred on the balance between the principle of open justice and the need to protect the privacy of individuals pursuing personal injury claims.

Greg Cox, CEO of Simpson Millar, which acted for interveners the Personal Injuries Bar Association (PIBA), said the balance was ‘a difficult one to strike.

‘We are delighted that the Court of Appeal upheld the principles that were set out in JX MX v Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust [2015] EWCA Civ 96 so that vulnerable clients can be protected and that the court resolved the uncertainty caused by the first instance decision in PMC.’

Cox said the ruling would provide important reassurance for injured people and their families.

The decision overturns the ruling of the High Court, where Mr Justice Nicklin found it impractical to grant anonymity once details of the claimant’s identity and medical history had already been reported in the press. Nicklin J distinguished Dartford partly on the basis these details were already in the public domain.

Delivering the lead judgment, however, Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, said: ‘I do not think that the fact that there has been previous publicity is an automatic bar to the making of either a WO [withholding order] or an RRO [reporting restrictions order] in these types of case.

‘It is, of course, an important factor for the court to take into account.’

Carys Lewis, associate at Hugh James, which acted for PMC, said the decision ‘offers useful guidance for legal teams seeking to protect vulnerable claimants without unduly restricting press access or public scrutiny’ and ‘confirms that an anonymity order can be applied for during and throughout proceedings if required, and in circumstances where the family has been involved in previous publicity’.

Issue: 8129 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Health , Media , Privacy
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School highlights a turbulent end to 2025 in the civil courts, from the looming appeal in Mazur to judicial frustration with ever-expanding bundles, in his final NLJ 'The insider' column of the year
Antonia Glover of Quinn Emanuel outlines sweeping transparency reforms following the work of the Transparency and Open Justice Board in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll