header-logo header-logo

24 January 2025 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 8101 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Pre-nuptial agreements: where are we now?

204790
To what extent are pre-nuptial agreements now recognised under English law? Mark Pawlowski weighs up the latest decisions
  • This article considers the court’s approach to pre-nuptial agreements and reviews the case law focusing on both decisions where the agreement has been upheld, and those where (for a variety of reasons) it has not been enforced.
  • It also examines the court’s approach to foreign pre-nuptial agreements entered into by the parties who subsequently seek divorce in the English courts.

A growing number of cases decided since the Supreme Court ruling in Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 have highlighted that pre-nuptial agreements are no longer regarded as contrary to public policy under English law. Our courts will now enforce such agreements, provided certain safeguards are met.

The effect, where such agreements are upheld, is to limit or preclude the parties from relying on the court’s discretionary jurisdiction under s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) in determining the proper distribution of family assets on divorce.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll