header-logo header-logo

Practising fee cut

28 July 2011
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The practising certificate fee decrease next year has been approved by the Law Society council

The individual fee will fall from £428 to £328 while the fee paid by solicitors firms will fall by 23%. The Council also approved a rise in contributions to the Compensation Fund. Individual contributions will be set at £60 next year, while firms will pay £770. Law Society chief executive Desmond Hudson attributed the fall to the closure of the Society’s defined benefit pension scheme, “together with the benefits of the investments made over the last few years in systems and a major cost reduction and efficiency programme”.
 

Issue: 7476 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll