header-logo header-logo

16 October 2015 / Clare Arthurs , Richard Marshall
Issue: 7672 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A practical alphabet

nlj_7672_a-z

Clare Arthurs & Richard Marshall share an (almost) A-Z guide to freezing injunctions

Adequate remedy

The applicant must show why compensatory damages are not an adequate remedy.

Brace yourself

If you are the applicant, prepare for the respondent to criticise and challenge your application. If you are the respondent, prepare to do battle!

CPR 25

The Rule, and its practice direction. Have you read it recently? Read it again!

Dissipation

What evidence is there that the respondent will/not dispose of his assets?

Ex parte hearing

The court will only to agree to grant an injunction without notice if there is good reason to do so: i.e. exceptional urgency and/or evidence of dissipation.

Full and frank disclosure

The applicant must present all material elements of the case to the court, both legal and factual, whether they support or undermine the application.

Good arguable case

The minimum threshold for obtaining an injunction.

Honesty

Is definitely the best policy. Failure to comply with the duty to give full and frank disclosure throughout the life of the injunction may

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll