header-logo header-logo

27 July 2021
Issue: 7943 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate , Court of Protection , Profession
printer mail-detail

Powers of attorney overhaul

Ministers are consulting on plans to overhaul the lasting power of attorney (LPA) process, shifting to a mainly digital service and introducing more safeguards against fraud and abuse

LPAs were introduced in 2007 under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, and the numbers have risen in recent years to more than five million. A 12-week consultation launched last week, insert name, contains plans to speed up and simplify the process of nominating someone to have LPAs by making the service digital. To counteract fraud, the Office of the Public Guardian’s (OPG) powers would be expanded to allow it to check identities and stop or delay any registrations that flag up concerns.

The consultation will cover witnessing and remote witnessing and the need for safeguards, expansion of the OPG’s powers, treatment of objections to LPAs, and how solicitors can access the service. Any changes will require amendments to the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Respond to the consutation, at bit.ly/3BxCPE7 by 13 October.

Tim Snaith, partner at Winckworth Sherwood, said: ‘Each form is over 20 pages long, requires in excess of six signatures (sometimes this can reach in excess of ten), and must be signed in a strict order.

‘Lasting Powers of Attorney must also be registered with the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) before they become effective. Even if no mistakes have been made on the forms, there is a minimum waiting period of four weeks before registration to allow for any objections, and due to delays at the OPG, it commonly takes around 12 weeks before the documents can be used.’

However, Snaith warned that any modernisation reforms must be carefully balanced against the risk of abuse.

Professor Chris Bones, chair of CILEX, welcomed the government plans and called on ministers also to correct ‘a longstanding anomaly’ where only solicitors and notaries public (and not CILEX Lawyers) can certify LPAs.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll