header-logo header-logo

29 January 2016 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Powerhouse

nlj_7684_parpworth

Neil Parpworth on the matter of reforming the powers of the House of Lords

In its manifesto published prior to the 7 May 2015 General Election, the Conservative Party proposed to do a great many things if elected, including the introduction of “English votes for English laws” and the repeal of the Human Rights Act 1998. Progress has been made on both of these constitutional issues. Thus the Standing Orders of the House of Commons have been amended to provide for new legislative procedures in the case of “English-only” legislation, and the publication of a consultation paper on a British Bill of Rights is eagerly awaited. The manifesto contained no proposals, however, on House of Lords reform. Rather, it was made clear that this would not be a priority for a new Conservative government. Things have now changed as a consequence of the events which took place in the House of Lords on 26 October 2015 when their Lordships rejected the Draft Tax Credits (Income Thresholds and Determination of Rates) (Amendment) Regulations 2015 drafted pursuant to the Tax

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll