header-logo header-logo

01 May 2008 / Kate Edwards
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail

The power to Improve

Kate Edwards discusses how employee rights can be enhanced after a TUPE transfer

Regent Security Services Limited v Power [2007] EWCA Civ 118, [2007] All ER (D) 298 (Nov) concerned the interpretation of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981 (TUPE), but has wide implications for how the rights and obligations of employees and employers upon a TUPE transfer taking place are to be construed. In particular, the decision makes clear that upon transfer an employee not only retains pre-transfer rights, but may acquire additional rights by agreement with the transferee employer. Where such additional rights are acquired, eg by consensual contractual variation, the employee thereafter has a choice of whether to rely upon the old pre-transfer contract, or new (varied) version. The decision thus represents a pro-employee stance in which the EC Acquired Rights Directive 1977/1877 (the Directive) is construed so as to give maximum choice and maximum benefit to employees who transfer under the TUPE Regulations. The transferee employer, however, may be left with an unpredictable burden.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll