header-logo header-logo

Postal Services Act 2011 (Disclosure of Information) Order 2012 (SI 2012/Draft)

14 February 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Prescribes bodies or other persons, enactments and circumstances and purposes which are exempt from the general prohibition...

Commencement date

To be appointed


Enabling Power

Postal Services Act 2011, s 56(2), (3), (4)


Summary

Prescribes bodies or other persons, enactments and circumstances and purposes which are exempt from the general prohibition in the Postal Services Act 2011 (the 2011 Act) on disclosure of information obtained by virtue of the exercise of regulatory functions under Part 3 of that Act. Ofcom (the new postal services regulator) has statutory powers under section 55 of the 2011 Act to require information to be provided. The effect of this Order is to supplement the existing exemptions, set out in section 56, to that general prohibition. Taken together with the exemptions to the general prohibition on disclosure provided in section 56(2), the provisions of this Order have the effect of creating a disclosure regime comparable to the (now repealed) permitted disclosure regime in Schedule

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll