header-logo header-logo

03 May 2018
Issue: 7791 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Post-Brexit justice remains uncertain

The final deal Britain strikes with the EU should not be subject to the direct jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (CJEU), the Law Society has warned.

Instead, the Law Society has urged the government to create a bespoke, UK-based mechanism for individuals and organisations to resolve disputes relating to the deal. In its paper, ‘Brexit: Options for a future UK-EU Dispute Settlement Mechanism’, published this week, the Law Society suggests that the new mechanism be modelled on the CJEU or the European Free Trade Area (EFTA) Court preliminary ruling system.

‘At the moment disputes are handled by the CJEU and, as an EU member, we’ve had judges sitting in that court and UK lawyers representing clients,’ said Law Society president Joe Egan.

‘The jurisdiction will remain during any transition. However, once we leave we think the CJEU should be denied direct jurisdiction over the new agreement because the UK will no longer have full participation in the court.’

The UK currently has three ECJ judges and an advocate general.

Issue: 7791 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll