header-logo header-logo

Possession claims against trespassers (Pt I)

09 February 2018 / Gavin Bennison
Issue: 7780 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
nlj_7780_bennison

In this two-part series, Gavin Bennison considers the practicalities of obtaining injunctive relief against trespassers in County Court possession proceedings. This week—injunctions

  • When and how practitioners bringing possession claims against trespassers in the County Court under CPR Pt 55 might going about seeking injunctive relief in addition to a possession order.

In Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs v Meier & Ors [2010] 1 All ER 855, the Supreme Court held unanimously, affirming a 2–1 decision of the Court of Appeal, that a court might combine an order for possession of land made against trespassers with a prohibitory injunction restraining continued trespass onto the same land. In the author’s experience, however, it is rare that an injunction restraining trespass is sought in addition to an order for possession in possession proceedings against trespassers brought in the county court under Part 55 of the Civil Pocedure Rules (CPR). A recent case, which concerned repeated and wide-ranging acts of trespass onto a large plot of scrubland, afforded the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll