header-logo header-logo

Pornography law: wholesale review needed

02 October 2019
Issue: 7858 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
The rape pornography law, introduced in 2015, has had little impact, with very few charges or prosecutions, according to a study by Durham University. 

It found that during 2015–2017, 85% of extreme pornography charges were for possessing bestiality porn with only 1% of charges for rape pornography. The authors of the study are calling for a wholesale review of laws regulating pornography. Professor Clare McGlynn, of Durham Law School, said she was ‘extremely disappointed’ that the data ‘suggests porn involving animals is the focus of police action rather than rape porn’.

Issue: 7858 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll