header-logo header-logo

03 November 2021
Issue: 7955 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-detail

Poll casts doubt on commonhold reform

Leasehold practitioners have reported low interest in commonhold since the government proposed reforms in January

The proposals included the removal of ground rent and marriage value, and the establishment of a Commonhold Council to advise the government on implementation of commonhold, which allows homeowners to own the freehold of individual flats in a block or houses on an estate.

However, fewer than one in ten leasehold practitioners report an increase in general or specific enquiries about commonhold since January―suggesting either lack of interest or scepticism about the reforms coming to fruition. Only 3.6% of the practitioners had an increase in specific enquiries.

The poll was commissioned by the government and conducted among Association of Leasehold Enfranchisement Practitioners (ALEP) members. ALEP members work as valuers, solicitors and barristers in the leasehold sector, so their clients are among those most likely to convert to the commonhold model.

One respondent, who works as a valuer, said: ‘Many clients are individual lessees, and our experience is that even in blocks of flats as small as six it is often hard to get enough consensus to enfranchise, so to change to commonhold must be just as potentially difficult.’

Another respondent said: ‘Commonhold is probably seen as unnecessary, if similar results can be obtained by the lessees of flats purchasing the freehold of their block and extending their leases, with which the majority of flat owners are familiar.’

Moreover, the government has provided no timetable for reform, and ALEP members doubt it will come soon.

Solicitor Mark Chick, a director of ALEP, said: “98% of delegates who voted at our recent conference indicated that they thought there was no prospect of reform in the next two years―something that is perhaps not surprising, given the number of things that will need to be “fixed” to make commonhold work.’ 

Issue: 7955 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll