header-logo header-logo

13 November 2019 / Sinead O’Callaghan
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Opinion , Company , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Political advertising: going off message?

Sinead O’Callaghan considers the ramifications of breaching the Companies Act when directors opt to further their own political agenda

JD Wetherspoon has been accused of breaching the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) after failing to seek shareholder approval for spending on pro-Brexit messaging ahead of the 2016 referendum.

Chairman Tim Martin reportedly used company funds to finance over £90,000 worth of pro-Brexit material. In doing so, Mr Martin is likely to have been in breach of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) because pursuant to s 366 of CA 2006, political expenditure must be authorised (in the case of a company that is not a subsidiary of another company) by a resolution of the members prior to the political expenditure being incurred. 

The definition of political expenditure is found in s 365 and is expenditure incurred by a company on:

‘(a) the preparation, publication or dissemination of advertising or other promotional or publicity material (i) of whatever nature; and (ii) however published or otherwise disseminated, that at the time  of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll