header-logo header-logo

12 July 2012
Issue: 7522 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

PIs under surveillance

Mulcaire & colleagues to face greater scrutiny

MPs have called for private investigators to be licensed and regulated to deter rogue practitioners.

A report by the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee, published last week, revealed between 2,000 and 10,000 private investigators are operating in the UK—the exact number is not known.

The Committee recommended that a “robust” licensing and registration system be set up as soon as possible, called on the government to strengthen the penalties for data offences, and proposed that the Independent Police Complaints Commission take over investigations in cases where police corruption is alleged.

Peter Taylor, a private investigator with Privatedetective.co.uk, says: “Current penalties for Data Protection Act breaches are woefully inadequate, with a typical fine for doing so not likely to be more than around £100. Licensing will pave the way for far stiffer penalties, as rogue operators are faced with the prospect of losing their licensing and the right to trade as a private investigator.”

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court last week unanimously dismissed private investigator Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal over voicemail messages of Nicola Phillips, an employee of public relations consultant Max Clifford.

The ruling, Phillips v Mulcaire [2012] UKSC 28, means Mulcaire may now have to reveal who at the News of the World instructed him to intercept Phillips’ voicemail and to which journalist the information was passed.

Mulcaire had relied on the legal privilege against self-incrimination in civil proceedings.

However, Phillips successfully argued that s 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 excluded that privilege.

Mulcaire was imprisoned five years ago along with former News of the World royal editor Clive Goodman for conspiring to hack into royal aides’ voicemails.

Issue: 7522 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll