header-logo header-logo

29 September 2011 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Pillow talk

Mark Solon advises how to get your expert out of bed

Experts must be feeling that it’s not worth coming out from under the duvet because of recent developments in the field. Experts are now liable in negligence and for breach of contract since the decision in Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13, [2011] 2 All ER 671, and now fees in publicly funded cases are to be capped from next Monday. Perhaps experts should stick with the day job.

Contractual position

What can instructing solicitors do to help? Let’s start with the contractual position. A client instructs a solicitor to conduct litigation on their behalf and if an issue arises requiring expert opinion evidence, the solicitor will generally contract with an appropriate expert and charge for the fee as a disbursement that will eventually be paid by the client or through legal aid.

Instructing an expert is no longer a risk-free activity. The Jones decision may well have implications for the relationship between solicitor and expert. Clearly the solicitor will want

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll