header-logo header-logo

20 September 2023
Issue: 8041 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

PII higher for smaller firms

The average professional indemnity insurance (PII) premium is equivalent to 5% of a law firm’s annual turnover—but small firms pay more
Research commissioned by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and Legal Services Board (LSB) found premiums typically ranged between 3% and 9% of annual turnover, with a 5% median.

However, the research identified that one in five of the 300 firms studied paid premiums worth 10% of turnover or even more. The vast majority (90%) of these firms paying 10% or more were small firms.

The researchers investigated the reasons for the difference. The key factor was practice area—the more property work a firm did, the higher their premium, with analysis suggesting such work attracts premiums of 8%–12% of turnover. In contrast, work on uncontested divorces was estimated to attract premiums of between 2%–7% of turnover.

Firms were also charged higher premiums where they had a history of regulatory findings, had a higher ratio of fee earners and qualified fee earners compared to turnover, or tended to hold more client money.

Other factors included the relative sophistication of the firm’s cyber and security arrangements, ability to absorb losses or recompense clients from other work, and the size of the overall premium paid as the higher the fee the more open the insurer to a bespoke arrangement.

The SRA and LSB said their discussions with insurers indicated premiums are unlikely to fall in the near term. The research, ‘Econometric analysis of PII costs for legal services providers’, was published last week.

Separately, the Law Society has revised its practice note on PII. Law Society president Lubna Shuja said the note was ‘new and improved’, and would benefit the ‘almost 40% of solicitors’ firms [who] still renew their PII on the old common renewal date of 1 October’. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll