header-logo header-logo

28 September 2011
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

PI renewal struggle

Small law firms have struggled to pay their professional indemnity insurance premiums ahead of this week's deadline

Independent finance provider Syscap, which funds insurance purchase for law firms of all sizes, says it has seen a “dramatic surge” in demand from firms of up to four partners.

Philip White, CEO of Syscap, said: “This year the biggest increases in insurance premiums seem to be concentrated on the smaller law firms.

“Ironically, it is the smaller law firms that can least afford higher insurance costs as their income from legal aid work and from conveyancing is under pressure. Insurers are worried that these small law firms create more risk because of their exposure to the conveyancing market. Litigation against law firms for doing residential property work tends to follow a fall in property prices.

“Before the credit crunch a small law firm would be able to borrow from their bank to pay for their insurance premium—now the banks are reluctant to lend to small businesses of all kinds.”

Firms who fail to secure renewal automatically go into the “assigned risks pool”, an emergency measure which costs them 30% of their annual turnover (27% for sole traders).

In July, insurance broker Lockton predicted that this year’s premiums would be at least 10% higher than last year for smaller firms. Last month, insurer Chartis (formerly AIG) said it intended its new clients to be firms with 10 or more partners.

Issue: 7483 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll