header-logo header-logo

18 June 2021 / Nathan Wells
Issue: 7937 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Personal representatives: Sending on the substitutes

51263
Nathan Wells examines the removal & replacement of personal representatives
  • Claims under section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985 for the removal of personal representatives: procedure and evidence.

Section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985 (AJA 1985) gives the High Court jurisdiction to remove or replace personal representatives where this is necessary in the interests of the welfare of the beneficiaries and the proper administration of the estate.

The jurisdiction has proved to be a fecund source of litigation and the sphere of operation of AJA 1985, s 50 was increased by the decision in Goodman v Goodman [2013] EWHC 758 (Ch), where Newey J confirmed that it could be employed to seek the removal of a named executor (though not a potential administrator) who had not yet obtained a grant of probate.

There was, initially, a striking dearth of reported authority on the operation of the section. Fortunately, that situation has been remedied in recent years and there is a growing body of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll