header-logo header-logo

Personal injury: lessons from 2022

09 December 2022 / Vijay Ganapathy
Issue: 8006 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Costs , Damages , Military
printer mail-detail
104000
Vijay Ganapathy considers key issues dealt with by the courts in headline personal injury cases this year
  • Determining whether the English courts had jurisdiction to hear a case involving an accident in Cyprus, based on the claimant’s residence.
  • Enforcing a costs order in a ‘mixed’ claim.
  • Increasing the options for bringing employers’ liability claims against dissolved defendants.

As we near the end of the year and head into 2023, one area that fills many practitioners with dread is the likely withdrawal in December next year of all EU regulations and directives implemented here as domestic law. While some may be assimilated back into UK legislation, the changes will be drastic.

Determining residence

It will be interesting to see, therefore, what impact—if any—past decisions have on future rulings. Recently, in Stait v Cosmos Insurance Ltd Cyprus [2022] EWCA Civ 1429, the Court of Appeal determined whether the English courts had jurisdiction to hear a case involving an accident in Cyprus in 2017. At the time,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll