header-logo header-logo

22 January 2015
Issue: 7637 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Pensions mis-selling scandals warning

A top pensions law firm has warned of “confusion” and “a high level of mis-selling” when the Chancellor’s pension reforms come into force in April.

Under the Taxation of Pensions Act 2014, savers over the age of 55 will be able to withdraw as much of their pension as they want as a lump sum. Currently, they can withdraw up to 25% and must buy an annuity with the remainder. Many people have welcomed the extra control they will have over their money.

However, Katherine Dandy, partner at Sackers, says: “These reforms have been introduced too quickly and come at a time when annuities have been proven to provide poor value for many people.

“Confusion and lack of understanding will result in a significant level of mis-selling.

“The biggest risk relates to members with long service who, at the age of 55, may be tempted to transfer their final salary scheme to a money purchase scheme in order to benefit from the rule changes. For this category of members the risk is significant and the money involved that could end up being mis-sold could run in to the billions.

“The mis-selling scandal of the 1990s and the ease with which people were persuaded to part with their valuable pension pots demonstrated many were totally unaware of the value of their final salary scheme. They were often mistaken by the belief that they can do better themselves by investing the money elsewhere. This proved not to be the case, and resulted in huge claims.”

Issue: 7637 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll