header-logo header-logo

02 March 2017
Issue: 7736 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Peers support EU nationals

The House of Lords has voted 358 to 256 to secure the right for EU nationals to stay in the UK post-Brexit.

Seven Conservatives joined Peers from other parties to vote for the amendment to the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill (Brexit Bill).

Some Conservative MPs, who will have their say on the Bill when it returns to the House of Commons in two weeks’ time, had argued that giving guarantees to EU citizens in Britain would reduce the UK’s bargaining power in negotiations over the status of its own nationals living in Member States.

The amendment means the Bill will now go through “Parliamentary ping pong”, moving between the two Houses. Labour MPs have said they will support the amendment, but, while there is some support, Conservative MPs may be harder to convince.

The Bill has been passing through the committee stage of the Lords. Earlier this week, Lord Hain failed to persuade a majority of Peers to back an amendment committing the government to negotiating Brexit on the basis the UK would remain in the single market.

Issue: 7736 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll