header-logo header-logo

PD 57AC: trial witness statement reform

26 March 2021 / Hoi-Yee Roper , Olivia Dhein
Issue: 7926 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , In Court
printer mail-detail
43918
New requirements for trial witness statements in the Business & Property Courts, outlined by LexisPSL solicitors Hoi-Yee Roper & Olivia Dhein
  • The new CPR practice direction and appendix, PD 57AC, updates the rules for trial witness statements in the Business and Property Courts.
  • It enters into force on 6 April 2021 and applies to witness statements signed on or after that date, in both existing and new proceedings.

New CPR practice direction and appendix, PD 57AC, builds on the existing CPR and includes new requirements that witness statements:

  • identify by list the documents the witness has referred to;
  • be prepared in accordance with the Statement of Best Practice contained in the appendix to PD 57AC;
  • be verified by an enhanced statement of truth known as the confirmation of compliance; and
  • be endorsed by a certificate of compliance signed by the relevant legal representative.

The provisions of PD 57AC are limited to trial witness statements in the Business and Property Courts (BPC)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll