header-logo header-logo

Paying LIP service

07 August 2008 / Edwina Millward
Issue: 7333 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

How do litigants in person impact on court business? Edwina Millward explains

Shrinkage of legal aid and the level of lawyers' fees being out of the reach of the majority of the public without a conditional fee agreement or legal expenses insurance mean that, except in the House of Lords, your opponent these days will very often be in person. It's a situation which impacts in family as well as civil cases and, in the former, guidance just published is testament to it.

Every county court advocate has to deal with unrepresented parties. Their involvement in litigation is generally a complicating factor, calling for a different approach by both advocate and judge to that which might be adopted if all parties were represented. Where appropriate, the judge will be appreciative of discussion—if only as to housekeeping—between advocate and litigant in person (LIP) before the case is called and this should be reported on to the judge at the outset of the hearing. The litigant will often be grateful if the report is made by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll