header-logo header-logo

26 May 2011
Issue: 7467 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Patents progress

Copyright review calls for “unified European patent system”

A “digital copyright exchange” or online shop where copyrights could be bought and sold would help businesses cope with the complex laws of intellectual property, according to the Hargreaves review.

The review, Digital Opportunity, led by Cardiff University’s Professor Ian Hargreaves, calls for the creation of a unified European patent system, and for patent fees to be reformed so there is no longer an incentive to create “thickets” or multiple layers of patents.

It was set up six months ago following Google’s announcement that it could not have started its business in the UK because of the copyright laws.
However, Hargreaves rejects the possibility of introducing a US-style “fair use” policy, which would be illegal under EU law.

Mark Owen, head of  IP at Harbottle & Lewis, said: “When David Cameron set the review up he made much of the benefits he saw from introducing a fair use right, and cynics detected in this an attempt to appear pro-innovation without the government having to do much, in particular not spend money as through tax breaks.

“As plenty of commentators said at the time, EU law would not allow this. Hargreaves has echoed that and dismissed the possibility of a fair use law. Instead he has listened and listed a large number of less radical changes government must consider.”

Owen said the review was “careful and balanced”.

“Perhaps the most important idea is that the UK should introduce the same exceptions to copyright as the rest of the EU. Bringing our law more into line internationally is worth considering. From the perspective of important trading partners such as the US and the EU, much about UK copyright law seems odd and out of step, and this costs us.”

Simon Mounteney, partner at Marks & Clerk, said implementation of many of the recommendations might “prove extremely challenging”.
 

Issue: 7467 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll