header-logo header-logo

Patents

26 April 2012
Issue: 7511 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Wagner International AG and other companies v Earlex Ltd [2012] EWHC 984 (Pat), [2012] All ER (D) 83 (Apr)

A patent would be invalid for added matter if the matter disclosed in the specification of the patent extended beyond that disclosed in the application for the patent as filed. A patent might only be amended within the limits of what a skilled person would derive directly and unambiguously, using common general knowledge and seen objectively and relative to the date of filing from the whole of the documents as filed. It was settled law that there were two requirements for a claim to be anticipated by a prior document: disclosure and enablement. The disclosure to be derived from the public availability of an article depended on the extent to which the public had unrestricted access to it.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll