header-logo header-logo

Patent

02 December 2010
Issue: 7444 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Lykiardopulo v Lykiardopulo [2010] EWCA Civ 1315, [2010] All ER (D) 225 (Nov)

The words “the employer” in s 41(2) of the Patents Act 1977 went back to the words “an employer” in the opening words of that section. In the opening words, it meant the actual employer—the legal entity which was the real assignor. The statute required consideration of the actual assignment from the actual employer to the actual connected person.

The words “benefit derived or expected to be derived” in s 41(2) was deemed to be the amount the employer could reasonably be expected to have derived if the assignee had not been connected, knowing what benefit had in fact been obtained by the assignee. On the true construction of s 41(2), the words “that person” meant the actual assignee with its actual attributes.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll