header-logo header-logo

23 January 2025 / Rachel Davenport
Categories: Features , Family , Mediation , Health , ADR
printer mail-detail

*Partner copy* Drug, Alcohol and DNA testing in Non-Court Dispute Resolution (AlphaBiolabs)

Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the role that Drug, Alcohol and DNA testing can play in non-court dispute resolution   

Changes to the Family Procedure Rules in relation to non-court dispute resolution (NCDR), which came into force in April 2024, marked a transformative moment for family law professionals and mediation practices in the UK.

Designed to strengthen the role of mediation by placing emphasis on non-adversarial approaches and broadening the definition of NCDR to include a wide range of methods for dispute resolution, the rules seek to empower families to resolve conflicts constructively, with minimal court intervention.

However, the success of mediation often depends on the trust and cooperation of all parties. In cases involving allegations of substance misuse or disputes over biological relationships, impartial evidence provided by drug, alcohol and DNA testing can help to:

  • Reduce conflict by clarifying disputed facts.
  • Build trust between the parties involved, promoting cooperation and understanding.
  • Support informed, child-focused decisions that prioritise safety and stability.

Drug, alcohol and/or DNA testing may be sought during NCDR for a variety of reasons including:

  • Where there are concerns about substance misuse ie where it is thought that a parent’s use of drugs or alcohol could impact their ability to care for a child safely. In this instance, drug and/or alcohol testing can help establish whether or not substance misuse is a factor.
  • For parentage disputes, DNA testing can be used to confirm biological relationships, allowing families to reach decisions about custody and financial arrangements based on accurate information.

Suspected substance misuse

Concerns surrounding a parent’s suspected substance misuse can heavily impact mediation where the issues of childcare and visitation are central to discussions. In these circumstances, drug and alcohol tests offer impartial evidence as to whether or not there has been recent or longer-term substance misuse.

Options for testing include:

  • Urine and oral fluid drug tests: Offering a narrow window of detection of up to four days for urine, and up to 48 hours for oral fluid, these tests are ideal for assessing recent substance use.
  • Hair and nail drug and alcohol tests: These tests provide a wide window of detection of up to 12 months.
  • PEth blood alcohol testing: Known as the gold standard blood alcohol test, this test detects alcohol consumption for up to four weeks and can even be used to detect chronic and single-drinking episodes.
  • SCRAM CAM® monitoring: A continuous alcohol-monitoring bracelet that takes a reading for alcohol in sweat every 30 minutes, SCRAM CAM provides ongoing and real-time insights into an individual’s drinking habits.

These methods ensure that decisions about parenting arrangements can be made based on objective evidence, prioritising the child/children’s welfare.

Parentage disputes

Uncertainty surrounding a child’s parentage can cause significant emotional strain during mediation, leading to emotionally charged discussions that dominate proceedings.

In these circumstances, DNA testing such as paternity testing or non-invasive prenatal paternity testing—which can be performed from as early as seven weeks into pregnancy, and is completely risk-free for mum and baby—can offer a simple, accurate and reliable way of confirming a child’s parentage.

This can allow separating families to reach decisions more quickly regarding visitation and custody arrangements, as well as financial support.

Drug, Alcohol and DNA testing for NCDR

The NCDR rules highlight the importance of open communication and co-operation in resolving family disputes, and helping families to reach agreements based on trust and clarity.

Whether testing is required to ensure a child’s safety or to confirm a biological relationship, AlphaBiolabs can help.

We have over 20 years’ experience providing drug, alcohol and DNA testing for legal and official matters, including as part of NCDR.

We also provide rapid results from our UKAS 17025-acredited UK laboratory, with all testing performed in the UK—so samples are never sent abroad.

For more information contact our New Enquiry team on 0333 600 1300 / testing@alphabiolabs.com or visit https://www.alphabiolabs.co.uk/legal-test-forms/, and we will be happy to discuss the requirements of your case.

About AlphaBiolabs

Founded in 2004 and headquartered in Warrington, Cheshire, AlphaBiolabs is a leading and award-winning provider of legally-instructed drug, alcohol and DNA testing services in the UK.

The company employs state-of-the-art techniques to provide timely, accurate, and cost-efficient laboratory testing to meet a range of needs. Its client base spans family law solicitors, immigration solicitors, social services, and local authorities.

It also offers free sample collection for legally-instructed drug, alcohol and DNA tests at its 21 walk-in centres across the UK and Ireland.

For further information, please contact AlphaBiolabs on 0333 600 1300, email media@alphabiolabs.com or visit https://www.alphabiolabs.co.uk


Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs

Since establishing the UK’s leading Drug, Alcohol & DNA testing laboratory in 2004, Rachel has continued to ensure that the wide range of services offered by AlphaBiolabs remains at the forefront of innovation and value, supporting family law professionals, social workers, and local authorities with court-approved solutions for family law cases. 

Categories: Features , Family , Mediation , Health , ADR
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll