header-logo header-logo

Part 36 gets a makeover

16 January 2015
Issue: 7636 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The new look Part 36, due to come into force on 6 April, addresses some of the most pressing problems encountered in practice, a QC has said.

Ed Pepperall QC, a commercial silk at St Philips Chambers and a member of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) which drew up the new Part 36, provides “an insider’s guide” to the new rules, in NLJ this week.

Part 36 is used in virtually every case, from modest-value fast-track claims to billion-pound litigation, he writes, and it is important “that its sophisticated system of carrots and sticks is fit for purpose”.

The new rules offer greater clarity on split trials and the extent to which a judge may be told about an offer. Litigators will be able to make time-limited offers, and offers are less likely to be discounted for technical reasons.

Another change is that notice to make an offer more advantageous will be treated as the making of a new offer on the improved terms rather than the withdrawal of the original offer.

The new Part 36 even takes account of the notorious Mitchell case—a new rule provides that litigants whose budget has been limited to court fees can nevertheless recover 50% of their costs assessed without reference to the limitation if they make an effective Part 36 offer.

Pepperall writes: “This solution is intended to ensure that the miscreant is still punished for the default that led to the sanction while the innocent party does not have a blank cheque to turn down reasonable settlement offers.”

Issue: 7636 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll