header-logo header-logo

Pardon me?

26 November 2020 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7912 / Categories: Opinion , Immigration & asylum , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
32882
Can President Trump lawfully pardon himself? Michael Zander on a very live question

Joe Biden is to be sworn in as President of the United States on Wednesday 20 January 2021. On that day, whether he graces the occasion with his presence or not, Mr Trump will become liable to criminal prosecution like any other citizen. Could he pardon himself before that fell day? The question sounds like an Alice-in-Wonderland absurdity.

The US Constitution states that the president ‘shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment’. (Art 2, s 2, cl 1). The phrase ‘offences against the United States’ means federal crimes. A pardon could therefore not affect the criminal tax fraud cases currently under investigation by Manhattan District Attorney, Cyrus Vance or civil fraud cases against President Trump currently under investigation by New York Attorney General, Letitia James.

Since no previous US president has exercised the power, the question whether a self-pardon is lawful has never yet been considered by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll