header-logo header-logo

Pandemic pay-outs ‘unprecedented’

24 February 2021
Issue: 7922 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
Insurers expect to pay £2bn for COVID-19 business interruption claims, the Association of British Insurers (ABI) has revealed.

A further £477m pay-out is predicted for life insurance, income protection, travel and general claims.

The data was collected from individual firms by the ABI in mid-late January.

Huw Evans, ABI director general, said: ‘The COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented in its impact and will be one of the biggest insured events of recent times.’

In January, the Supreme Court clarified whether certain clauses commonly used in business interruption policies would pay out for policyholders affected by the pandemic, in a test case brought by the Financial Conduct Authority, FCA v Arch & Ors [2021] UKSC 1. This opened the gates to payment of claims for tens of thousands of small business owners. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll