header-logo header-logo

Overhauling support for disabled children

17 September 2025
Issue: 8131 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Public , Local authority , Community care , Health
printer mail-detail
The current ‘postcode lottery’ of support for more than half a million disabled children in England could be replaced with clearer rights and national eligibility criteria, under Law Commission proposals

The commission recommends sweeping changes in its 220-page paper, ‘Disabled children’s social care: final report’, published this week after a two-year review and consultation.

It calls for a unified legal framework with nationally-set rather than locally-set criteria governing whether a disabled child gets support from social services, what help they get and how they get it. This would be accompanied by comprehensive guidance setting out the rights and responsibilities of children, families and local authorities.

Current Children Act 1989 protections would be retained, and a discrete set of rights and entitlements added to the Act.

Disabled children would be given express rights to request social care assessments and provided with independent advocacy when needed. The commission also wants to strengthen cooperation between health, education and social care services, particularly during transition planning to adulthood.

Currently, parents, carers and local authorities must navigate an assortment of legislation dating back to the 1970s and 1980s. According to the commission, this not only makes accessing support unnecessarily complicated but has resulted in children in some parts of the country being given support while children in other parts with identical needs are not. Many of the legal definitions are now out of date: for example, the definition of ‘disability’ dates from the Second World War.

Alison Young, Commissioner for Public Law, said: ‘These recommendations represent a crucial step towards ensuring disabled children receive the support they need, when they need it, regardless of where they live.

‘Our proposals would create a simpler, fairer and more accessible framework that puts the child’s best interests at the heart of decision-making whilst maintaining vital protections.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll