header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007 / Clare Copeman
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Outside help

The upside of external funding is clear, but firms should watch out for pitfalls says Clare Copeman

By the end of 2006, over 50% of the top 100 UK law firms had registered as limited liability partnerships with Companies House, which represents a significant development within the sector. However, the Legal Services Bill paves the way for further change, as it will allow firms to be licensed as alternative business structures (ABSs) with external (non-lawyer) shareholders or stakeholders.

A survey of 88 of the top 125 law firms, published by Smith & Williamson earlier this year shows that over half of those questioned expect to see firms seeking external funding, through private equity and public listing. The potential upside of external funding is clear to see…but firms must beware the possible pitfalls.

Tax and LLPs

The traditional partnership model has tended to suit law firms well, as they are generally people businesses with relatively low capital requirements. There has therefore been no great need to accumulate capital within the business—which can be done more tax-efficiently

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll