header-logo header-logo

Out of kilter?

21 June 2012 / Mark Sefton , Oliver Radley-gardener
Issue: 7519 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Tenant’s break options—what do you have to pay? By Mark Sefton & Oliver Radley-Gardener

 

The Feast of the Annunciation, the Nativity of St John the Baptist, the Feast of the Archangel St Michael, and the Nativity of Christ, are all feast days in the mediaeval calendar of saints. But history lingers on, and they are also, under most modern commercial leases, the dates when the tenant will have agreed to pay the rent, quarterly in advance. They are, of course, the usual quarter days of 25 March, 24 June, 29 September and 25 December.

It is not uncommon for commercial leases to include a tenant’s break option, and, where they do, the date on which the tenant can break the lease is often less religiously tied to the major festivals of the Christian cycle. Sometimes, in other words, the break date falls somewhere between two rent days.

Conditions apply

Normally, the break option will be conditional on the tenant having paid all the rent due up to
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll