header-logo header-logo

Expert witnesses: Out for hire?

11 November 2022 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 8002 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail
100237
The independence of experts—can any more warnings be needed, asks Chris Pamplin
  • Covers caselaw illustrating disastrous examples where solicitors have ignored the independence of experts.

It is always frustrating when expert witness independence has to be called into question. Just when you think you’ve seen the worst transgression, another two come along.

Surely everyone knows that experts must not act as ‘hired guns’? Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Part 35 makes clear that an expert’s first duty is to the court, and this overrides any obligation to those who instruct or pay the expert.

Where the court directs discussions to take place between experts, neither the parties nor their legal representatives may attend, unless this has been ordered by the court or agreed by all parties and the experts. In the course of discussions, experts must give their own opinions to assist the court, and do not require the authority of the parties to sign a joint statement. The report must reflect the expert’s own opinion, and it should

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll