header-logo header-logo

09 March 2007 / Paul Dobson
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Out in the cold

Farepak’s collapse shows why legislation is urgently needed to protect pre-payments, says Paul Dobson

Section 8 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (EnA 2002) gives authority to the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) to make arrangements under which it can give its formal approval to codes of practice containing provisions for the protection of consumers. This section requires the OFT to specify criteria that it will apply in deciding whether to grant or withdraw such approval.

The OFT got off to a flying start and, while EnA 2002 was still only a Bill, consulted upon and then published the core criteria for its Consumer Codes Approval Scheme (CCAS). There must be hundreds of consumer codes operating in the UK economy. Yet, nearly five years after EnA 2002 was passed, there are still only six consumer codes that have achieved approval status, and one of those has since been withdrawn from the scheme by its sponsor.

Why are there so few? In large part, the answer is that for most sponsors and their member

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll