header-logo header-logo

Opt-out giant hits bump in the road

31 May 2023
Issue: 8027 / Categories: Legal News , Collective action , Competition
printer mail-detail
The Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) has issued its latest ruling in the mega-claim, Merricks v Mastercard Incorporated & ors.

Both the class representative and Mastercard had applied to appeal elements of the CAT’s judgment on preliminary issues—the class representative’s appeal relating to limitation, while Mastercard’s appeal related to exemptibility. Handing down judgment in Merricks v Mastercard [2023] CAT 33 last week, however, the CAT dismissed both applications for permission to appeal.

Walter Merricks, a former financial services ombudsman, is acting as class representative on behalf of 46 million customers in collective proceedings against Mastercard over multilateral interchange fees, in a claim valued at more than £16bn. The class action, launched in 2016 by Merricks, became the first to be granted an ‘opt-out’ collective proceeding order (everyone included unless specifically excluded), in 2021.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll