header-logo header-logo

Online justice: faster, more efficient, more unequal?

16 June 2017 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7750 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The government should take care not to be captivated by the magic of technology, says Geoffrey Bindman

A few weeks ago, I expressed doubts about the proposed online court for which preparations are well advanced in the Prisons and Courts Bill (see ‘Law and the Human Element’ , NLJ 10 March 2017). My main concern is the diminished role for trained human specialist advisers, ie lawyers. The likelihood is that only those who can afford to pay lawyers—the corporations and institutional parties to the litigation—will have them, perpetuating the inequality which undermines our justice system. My doubts have been reinforced by the collapse of the Dutch Rechtwijzer scheme, the pioneer in online dispute resolution to which the UK proposals owe their inspiration (see ‘Digital law crashes out…for now,’ Steve Hynes, NLJ , 28 April 2017,
p 7). More of that below.

Naturally I welcome efficiencies and economies which new technology can bring to many situations. The onward march of science continues to bring benefits. The development of robotics and artificial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll