header-logo header-logo

One size does not fit all

30 May 2012 / Amanda Melton
Issue: 7516 / Categories: Opinion , Divorce , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Amanda Melton argues against pigeonholing families within the law

There have been numerous discussions about contact after divorce or separation and how to prevent couples fighting through the courts over rights to see their children.

It is astonishing this has taken so much time to debate. That is not to suggest the issue is not one of huge importance, but rather that it should by now be obvious to us all that making all families fit into a pigeonhole is never going to work. Yes, we spend a great deal of money in families being represented in court, but has anyone stopped to ask whether these cases need the court’s intervention.

Norgrove report

The discussions started with the Norgrove report, published in November 2011. After investigation, Norgrove et al decided against a presumption of equality for parents. A subsequent announcement from the government stated an intention to introduce legislation compelling the judiciary to ensure each parent was able to see his or her children regularly/equally post separation. Now

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll