header-logo header-logo

On parole & under review

04 November 2020 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7909 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail
30960
Jon Robins reports on the inevitable decision to review the Parole system

It was revealed last month that the Parole Board will be the subject of a ‘root and branch’ review potentially opening up hearings to victims of crime as well as members of the press (bit.ly/3mO6Jfn). Is this a win for advocates of open justice or a rather shabby knee jerk response of a government pandering to the baser instincts of the tabloid press?

Brian Lea of Nottingham didn’t need much persuading. ‘The stuffy, almost ignorant people on the Parole Board should have been put out to grass years ago,’ he wrote in the letters page of The Sun last week. ‘Let’s hope it’s not replaced by something even more stupid.’ It’s a bit harsh on the judges, psychologists, psychiatrists, probation officers as well as lay members who typically comprise parole boards.

Reform of the parole system has been inevitable since the furore over the initial decision to back the release of the so called ‘black-cab rapist’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll