header-logo header-logo

Ombudsman changing the rules

10 September 2015
Issue: 7667 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Legal Ombudsman has launched proposals that would allow it to become an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) entity—and give clients a longer time to lodge complaints.

From 1 October 2015, under EU legislation, legal services providers must “signpost” consumers to an ADR entity that is competent to handle their complaint. In order to be compliant with the ADR Regulations, the Legal Ombudsman needs to change its rules, hence the consultation.

Under the ADR Regulations, the entity can refuse to deal with a complaint if it is brought more than 12 months after the trader tells the consumer it cannot resolve their complaint.

Currently, consumers must bring their complaint within six months of being told in writing by their lawyer to take it to the Legal Ombudsman, or within 12 months if that time span is specified in the lawyer’s letter.

The consultation also proposes changes to the grounds on which the Legal Ombudsman can refuse to handle complaints.

Issue: 7667 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll