Charlotte Hill dissects the much-anticipated judgment in Okpabi v Shell, where accountability for pollution in Nigeria was sought in the English courts
- Examines Okpabi v Royal Dutch Shell.
- Shell defeated a claim that it bore a duty of care for environmental damage caused by a subsidiary, arguing that the English courts did not have jurisdiction in the case.
- Lessons multinationals can draw from the case.
The Court of Appeal recently handed down its long-awaited judgment in Okpabi and others v Royal Dutch Shell Plc and another [2018] EWCA Civ 191 in respect of an application contesting jurisdiction, following a three-day hearing in November 2017 before Lord Justice Simon, Lord Justice Sales and Sir Geoffrey Vos, Chancellor of the High Court.
The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision that there was no arguable case against Royal Dutch Shell (RDS) by a 2:1 majority, holding that the English courts did not have jurisdiction to hear claims against RDS’s Nigerian subsidiary, the Shell Petroleum Developments Company Limited (SPDC).
This
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=e3c4b2f1_1)
